S v mintoor 1996
Web1. PURPOSE OF THE COURSE: Criminal Law at Rhodes University is two-semester course offered in the Penultimate year of the LLB degree. Successful completion of Criminal Law A (which concentrated on the general principles of criminal liability) is a prerequisite for Criminal Law B. The purpose of Criminal Law B is to build onto the knowledge and ... Webreview matter of S v Mintoor 1996 1 SACR 514 (C) in which the lower court had convicted the accused of stealing “eenhede elektrisiteit” (units of electricity). In setting aside the …
S v mintoor 1996
Did you know?
http://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZASCA/2015/144.pdf WebS v MD and NM SUMMARY X, the father of a nine-year-old girl, Z, expressed his wish to have sexual intercourse with this daughter to his wife, Y. The fact that the child …
Web59 In S v Mintoor, the accused was found guilty by a magistrate of stealing 901 units of energy. The question before the High Court was whether electricity may be stolen under … WebS v Mintoor 1996 1 SACR 514 (C) S.A. Legislation : Prevention of Organised Crime Act 121 of 1998 : Electricity Act 41 of 1987 s. 27 (2) Subject : Electricity theft This item appears in …
WebIf the witness tells the court that something was admitted or confessed by another person the admissibility of that evidence should only be determined with reference to the law governing admissions (or confessions – depending on the nature of the other person’s statement).It was made clear in Mdani v Allianz Insurance Ltd 1991 (1) SA 184 (A) 1891 – … WebNB this is new work not in the study guide: (NB marks) Theft of electricity Electricity is not a movable corporeal thing, so how can it be stolen? S v Mintoor 1996: o Charged with stealing 901 units of electricity from a municipality. o Court acquitted Mintoor.
WebIn S v Mintoor 1996 1 SACR 514 (C), … it was held that electricity is an energy and that energy is incapable of theft. … It was submitted that I should consider developing the common law to encompass energy as a thing capable of theft. In my view, I do not have to do so and I do not deal further with this issue.” Clearly it is
WebThe key words are “Mintoor”, and “electricity cannot be. stolen”. The issue in this question is clearly theft (of electricity), so go to the unit on theft (Study Unit 8), and look for information on the Mintoor-case. In your Study Guide 8.6, the following is noted (at the bottom of the page): “In Mintoor 1996 (1) SACR 514 (C) the court orcha liverpoolWebCase s v mintoor 1996 Movable or immovable things: Generally, the term immovable refers to land and everything that is attached to land by natural or artificial means. A thing is movable if its condition is such that it can be removed from one place to another but having regard to its nature and position. ips repairs contoocook nhWebThe molecules are digital in nature and if one compares it with the decision in S v Mintoor162 it is clearly incorporeal in nature. ... 162 1996 (1) SACR 514 (C). 163 See in general Snyman Criminal Law (2002) 535 et seq. All the South African cases deal with some form of corporeal property. See for example R v Mandatela and another 1948 (4) SA ... orcha lscftWebtrias politica (vide S v Augustine 1986 (3) SA 294 (C) at 3021-J; S v Mintoor 1996 (1) SACR 514 (C) at 517a-b; S v Malgas 2001 (2) SA 1222 (SCA) at 1226D; S v De Vicenzo 2003 (3) SA 572 (C) at 578C). The judgment was binding on mag istrates' courts countrywide between attorney. In addition, attorneys talk to orcha ltdWebthat stage, that electricity had the physical properties contemplated in S v Mintoor 1996 1 SACR 514 (C), which held that electricity could not be stolen. You are the presiding officer in the matter. After hearing all the evidence the only remaining question that arises is whether or not electricity can be stolen. 1. ips research okchttp://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZAGPJHC/2011/41.html ips repairsWebCRIMINAL PROCEDURE ACT 51 OF 1977. CRW EXAM PREP-1. CRW NOTES-1. CRW pack OCT Print. CRW TUT. CRW. crw1501 2013. crw1501 2014. crw1501 2015. orcha lodge soldotns ammenities